Saturday, 13 August 2016

objections on challan 173 Crpc





IN THE COURT OF IIND CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DADU.
Crl  M A    No        of 2015

 Sharif son of Noor Muhammad by caste
Panhwar, muslim, adult, resident of village
Lal Bux Panhwar taluka Dadu--------------------------------------------------Applicant/complainant
                                          Versus
1.       Rajib son of Khan Muhammad.
2.       Muharram son of Sabu
3.       Sarwar son of Qadir Bux.
4.       Meeral son of Mehar.
All by caste Panhwar, muslim, adult,
Resident of vllage Aandal Panhwar taluka
& District Dadu--------------------------------------------------------------------Accused/Opponents.
5.       The State

                                     OBJECTIONS ON SUMMARY.

                            It is respectfully prayed on behalf of the above named complainant that this Honourable court may kindly be pleased to join above named accused in the case and direct them to join trial as the investigation officer has disposed of the case of complainant/applicant under “C” class with malafide intention  on the consideration of following grounds.

G R O U N D S.

1.       That the complainant has registered FIR being crime No. 26/2015 U/S 324,337-A(i),504,147,148,149 PPC at P.S Makhdoom Bilawal on 27.8.2015, against the above named accused persons.

2.      That the accused persons have assaulted upon complainant party caused them danda blows and the accused Rajib with intention to commit murder of complainant party fired upon him but with grace of God same was missed.


3.      That the names of accused persons are mentioned in the FIR along with their specific role.

4.      That the accused persons are real culprits of offence, but the investigation officer of the case after obtaining illegal gratification from accused persons let them off and disposed of case of complainant under “C” class with malafide intention and with some ulterior motives.


5.      That the accused persons have committed non bailable offence, complainant and his witnesses have supported the version of complainant even the investigation officer have disposed of the case under “C” class which is not maintainable.
6.      That it is stated by the I.O that no evidence has come on record to connect with the accused with commission of offence, but the complainant and his witnesses were/are ready to support the contents of FIR.

7.      That investigation officer has not conducted fair investigation and he after obtaining huge money from accused side disposed of the case of complainant.


8.      That the accused persons are real culprits of case.

9.      That the investigation conducted by the I.O is not fair and only collected evidence which support the accused persons which clearly shows that investigation officer has not conducted investigation honestly.


10. That this honourable court may kindly be pleased to join the accused in case and issue NBWs against them.

11. That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.                                                                                    Advocate
              Dated:                                                                                  for complainant.



















 IN THE COURT OF IIND CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DADU.
                                                                                   Criminal Misc. Appl. No.        of 2015
Sharif son of Noor Muhammad by caste
Panhwar, muslim, adult, resident of village
Lal Bux Panhwar taluka Dadu--------------------------------------------------Applicant/complainant
                                          Versus
6.       Rajib son of Khan Muhammad.
7.       Muharram son of Sabu
8.       Sarwar son of Qadir Bux.
9.       Meeral son of Mehar.
All by caste Panhwar, muslim, adult,
Resident of vllage Aandal Panhwar taluka
& District Dadu--------------------------------------------------------------------Accused/Opponents.
10.   The State

                                          APPLICATION U/S 173 C.R.P.C

                            It is respectfully prayed on behalf of the above named applicant/complainant that this Honourable court may kindly be pleased to join above named accused in the case and direct them to join trial as the investigation officer has disposed of the case of complainant/applicant under “C” class with malafide intention  on the consideration of following grounds.

G R O U N D S.

12.  That the complainant has registered FIR being crime No. 26/2015 U/S 324,337-A(i),504,147,148,149 PPC at P.S Makhdoom Bilawal on 27.8.2015, against the above named accused persons.

13. That the accused persons have assaulted upon complainant party caused them danda blows and the accused Rajib with intention to commit murder of complainant party fired upon him but with grace of God same was missed.


14. That the names of accused persons are mentioned in the FIR along with their specific role.

15. That the accused persons are real culprits of offence, but the investigation officer of the case after obtaining illegal gratification from accused persons let them off and disposed of case of complainant under “C” class with malafide intention and with some ulterior motives.


16. That the accused persons have committed the offence and the complainant and his witnesses have supported the version of complainant even the investigation officer have disposed of the case.

17. That it is stated by the I.O that  no evidence has come on record to connect with the accused with commission of offence, but the complainant and his witnesses were/are ready to support the contents of FIR.


18. That investigation officer has not conducted fair investigation and he after obtaining huge money from accused side disposed of the case of complainant.

19. That the accused persons are real culprits of case.


20. That the investigation conducted by the I.O is not fair and only collected evidence which support the accused persons which clearly shows that investigation officer has not conducted investigation honestly.

21. That this honourable court may kindly be pleased to join the accused in case and issue NBWs against them.


22. That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dadu.                                                                                    Advocate
Dated:                                                                               for complainant.





















IN THE COURT OF IIND CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DADU.
                                                                                Criminal Misc. Appl. No.        of 2015

 Sharif son of Noor Muhammad by caste
Panhwar, muslim, adult, resident of village

Lal Bux Panhwar taluka Dadu --------------------------------------Applicant.

                                                       Vs

1.       Rajib son of Khan Muhammad.
2.       Muharram son of Sabu
3.       Sarwar son of Qadir Bux.
4.       Meeral son of Mehar.
All by caste Panhwar, muslim, adult,
Resident  of vllage Aandal Panhwar taluka
& District Dadu--------------------------------------------------------------------Accused/Opponents.
5.       The State
                                                                                                                Crime No:26/2015
                          P.S. Makhdoom Bilawal.
U/S 324, 337 Ai, 504,147, 148,149 PPC.
                                                                                A F F I D A V I T
                                                   I, Sharif son of Noor Muhammad by castePanhwar, muslim, adult, resident of
                                village Lal Bux Panhwar taluka Dadu , do hereby state on oath as under:-
1.                                   That I am complainant in the above matter and know the facts very well.
2.                                   That the investigation conducted by the I.O is not fair and only collected evidence which support the accused persons which clearly shows that investigation officer has not conducted investigation honestly.

3.                                   That this honourable court may kindly be pleased to join the accused in case and issue NBWs against them.


4.                                   That whatever is stated above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
5.                                   That the prayer is made in the interest of justice.

                                                                                                                                                Deponent
                                I know the deponent.

                                                Advocate
                                 Mujjan Ali Panhwar

No comments:

Post a Comment