IN THE COURT OF FAMILY JUDGE K.N SHAH.
Family
Suit No: of 2015
Mst:Kishwar--------------------------------------------------------------Plaintiff
Vs
Qasim
Ali--------------------------------------------------------------Defendant
APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 5
RULE 20 CPC
It is respectfully prayed on
behalf of the plaintiff that this Honourable court may kindly be pleased to
issue substitute service against the defendant by way of publication in any Sindhi
newspapers, on the consideration of the grounds set forth in the accompanying
affidavit.
The prayer is made in the
interest of justice.
Dadu. Advocate
Dated:
27.02 .2016. For the plaintiff.
IN THE COURT OF FAMILY JUDGE K.N SHAH.
Family Suit No: of 2015
Mst:Kishwar--------------------------------------------------------------Plaintiff
Vs
Qasim
Ali--------------------------------------------------------------Defendant
A F F I D A V I T
I, Mst: Kishwar daughter of Khushi
Muhammad, by caste , Muslim, Adult, House No 16 Brohi Muhalla
Shahbaz Colony K.N Shah Town, Taluka & District Dadu, do hereby state on oath as under:-
1. That I am plaintiff in the above matter
and know the facts very well.
2. That the accompanying application u/o 5
rule 20 CPC has been drafted and filed by my counsel under my instructions and
contents thereof may be treated as part and parcel of this affidavit.
3. That I had filed a suit for dissolution
of marriage against the defendant before this Honourable court which was
admitted.
4. That since the admission of the suit,
this Honourable court has repeatedly issued coercive process against the
defendant registered post A.D. as well as bailiff in order to procure his
attend to contest the matter.
5. That the defendant deliberately and
intentionally is avoiding to receive the ordinary process of this Honourable
court.
6. That
this Honourable court may be pleased to issue substitute service against the
defendant by way of publication in any Sindhi news paper in order to procure
the attendance of the defendant to contest the matter.
7. That whatever is stated above is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Deponent
The deponent is known to me
and is identified by me to the commissioner for taking affidavit.
Advocate Dadu.
Affirmed ON SA before me. The
deponent is identified by Mr.Mujjan Ali Panhwar Advocate, Dadu, who is known to me personally.
The contents of the plaint
were first truly and audibly read over and explained to deponent that she
understands well and she appears to have understood. She admitted the contents
of affidavit to be true and correct and put her signature/RTI on it in my
presence.
Commissioner for
taking affidavit
No comments:
Post a Comment