Thursday, 1 September 2016

Where guardians and Wards Act was pending then 491 crpc application or petition under 199 for recovery of minors is not maintainable

Where guardians and Wards Act was pending then 491 crpc application or petition under 199 for recovery of minors is not maintainable (MUJJAN ALI PANHWAR )
Art. 199---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 491 ---guardian s and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), S. 7---Constitutional petition filed before the High Court seeking custody of minors---maintainability ---Case for custody of minors already pending before the guardian Judge--- Effect--- Custody of minors with maternal grandmother after death of mother---Scope---Mother of children passed away, whereafter their custody was taken over by their maternal grandmother---Father of children sought their custody from the maternal grandmother, contending that they were in illegal custody---Validity---Issue of custody of minors was the subject-matter of a case which was pending in the guardian Court--- Invoking Art. 199 of the Constitution read with S. 491 , Cr.P.C. was thus untenable at present stage---Custody of minors with their maternal grandmother was not to be disturbed---Father had not brought on record any material to show as to who could look after the minors with the same zeal and affection as that of a maternal grandmother---Custody of minors with their maternal grandmother was not apparently illegal in such circumstances---Father had an equally efficacious remedy available under the guardian s and Wards Act, 1890---Constitutional petition being not maintainable was dismissed accordingly.
2014 PCrLJ 1249 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED
Side Opponent : IHTISHAM

case law on surprise visit at school

2013 S C M R 764
[Supreme Court of Pakistan]
Present: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J., Gulzar Ahmed and Sh. Azmat Saeed, JJ
PETITION REGARDING MISERABLE CONDITION OF THE SCHOOLS: In re
Constitution Petition No.37 of 2012, decided on 11th February, 2013.
Constitution of Pakistan---
----Arts. 25-A & 184(3)---Constitutional petition under Art.184(3) of the Constitution regarding condition of schools in all the Provinces of Pakistan---Right to free education---Scope---Illegal occupation of school buildings---School staffs being paid salaries despite providing no services---Existence of ghost schools---Appointment of Commission(s) by the Supreme Court to carry out survey of schools---Supreme Court observed that some of the schools situated in the Provinces were not being used for the purpose of imparting education to the students, and were either illegally occupied by the police or by other Government departments; that executive authorities despite being fully aware of Art.25-A of the Constitution were reluctant to improve the education sector inasmuch as different schools had been abandoned for one or the other reason but still monthly/annual expenditure were being incurred on such schools in terms of salary etc.; that no progress had been made as required by Art.25-A of the Constitution for providing free and compulsory education to all the children between the ages of five to sixteen years inasmuch as no laws had been promulgated on the subject by the Provinces; that education departments of Provinces had admitted existence of ghost schools; that it was not understandable why concerned officials were not taking initiatives or making laws to improve the education sector including removing of encroachments upon schools and taking steps to stop payments etc. to staff, which were getting salary without providing services; that education sector was the most important social service and the Government was bound to pay full attention to it in order to raise the standard of education and to ensure that the children were well educated---Supreme Court gave directions for appointment of all District and Sessions Judges or the Additional District and Sessions Judges at district/tehsil/taluka headquarters of all the provinces including Islamabad Capital Territory, as Commission(s) to carry out survey of schools functioning in their respective areas to determine as to how many schools were functioning fully and how many ghost schools were present in their districts; to determine as to how much of the education funds were being spent for the purpose of imparting education to the children and what was the ratio of children studying in their respective areas; to determine as to what were the reasons for encroachments/illegal occupation of school buildings and why cases concerning such encroachments were not being expedited by the courts and why no action was taken against encroachers--- Supreme Court further directed that Presidents or Secretary Generals of respective District/Tehsil Bars should also be associated with the Commission(s), if needed, in order to carry out physical inspection and submit reports.
Zulfiqar Hussain Noon, Applicant (in C.M.A. No.14 of 2013).
Rehmat Ullah Bilal, Applicant (in C.M.A. No.300 of 2013).
Azam Khan Khattak, Additional A.-G., Syed Naseer Shah, DS, Education and Nizzam-ud-Din Mengal, Director (Schools) for Government of Balochistan on Court's Notice.
Syed Arshad Hussain Shah, Additional A.-G., Syed Naseer Shah, Deputy Secretary, Jamal-ud-Din, C.P.O. (E&S) Edu. Deptt. and Hadayat Ullah, S.O. (Litigation) for Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on Court's Notice.
Jawwad Hassan, Additional A.-G. and Ali Hussain Malik, Additional Secretary for the Government of Punjab on Court's Notice.
Muhammad Qasim Mirjat, Additional A.-G., Syed Ashraf Ali Shah, Special Secretary Education Department and Muhammad Javed, OSD Litigation (E) for the Government of Sindh on Court's Notice.
Professor Waqar Arshad, Director and Muhammad Ahmed, Assistant Director for Secretary CADD and Chief Commissioner ICT on Court's Notice.
Date of hearing: 11th February, 2013.
ORDER
In response to order dated 24-1-2013, a report (C.M.A. No.725 of 2013) has been submitted under the signatures of Dr. Faizullah Pechuho, Secretary Education, Government of Sindh but no report has however been filed by the Chief Secretary, Sindh in compliance to the directions of this Court. Mr. Rehmat Ullah Bilal, Coordinator, Sindh Rural Development Society, also submitted additional documents (C.M.A. No.728 of 2013), perusal whereof indicate that some of the Schools situated in different parts of the Province of Sindh are not being used for the purpose of imparting education to the students, and either have been illegally occupied by the Police or the other Government Departments. Same is the position in the Provinces of Balochistan, KPK and Punjab. We fail to understand why the Executive Authorities being fully aware of the provision of Article 25-A of the Constitution are reluctant to improve the education sector inasmuch as the Schools have been abandoned for one or the other reason but the monthly/annual expenditures are being incurred in terms of the salary etc.
2. This case is pending for the last about one year and despite issuance of directions from time to time, no progress has been made as is required under the Constitution and the law for ensuring enforcement of fundamental right of providing free and compulsory education to all children between the ages of five to sixteen years inasmuch as the laws have not been promulgated on the subject. Only reports have been submitted time and again that preliminaries are being completed to do the needful. It may not be out of context to note that in the 18th amendment Article 25-A was incorporated in the Constitution to be one of the fundamental rights that the State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of five to sixteen years in such manner as may be determined by law but despite lapse of about more than two years, no progress has been made. Surprisingly, baseless and false reports have been filed before the Court but some credible information had been received through the Coordinator, Sindh Rural Development Society about the state of affairs of the education institution, in the Province of Sindh. The education departments of the other provinces also admitted that there are Ghost Schools or the property owned by the Schools have been occupied and without taking effective steps, the officers travel from their Provincial Headquarters to Islamabad for attending the cases before the Court but without showing any progress and we are unable to comprehend as to why they are not willing to take the benefits of the orders of the Court or act on their own initiative and make laws to improve the education sector including getting removed encroachments and also of stopping the payments etc. to the staff who are getting salary without providing services. Having left with no option, we are of the opinion that as far as the education sector is concerned, it is one of the most important social service and the executive Government is duty bond to pay full attention in order to raise the standard of education and to ensure that its children are well educated but here the things are otherwise. However under the circumstances, we direct the Provincial Government(s) through Chief Secretaries or the Secretary Education(s) to implement the orders of this Court in letter and spirit and in the meanwhile in order to have a clear picture we appoint all the District and Sessions Judges or the Additional District and Sessions Judges at the District/Tehsil/Taluka Headquarters of all the Provinces including ICT, as Commission(s) to carry out survey of the Schools functioning in their areas to determine:--
(i) As to how many Schools are functioning fully;
(ii) As to how many Ghost Schools are in their districts;
(iii) As to how much of the education funds are being spent for the purpose of imparting education to the children;
(iv) As to what is the ratio of the children studying in their areas;
(v) As to what are the reasons for encroachments of the said School buildings and why they are being used either as Baitkah/Autak or for the purpose of Houses by occupying forcibly some portions of the same and why actions against encroachers have not been taken; and
(vi) In case there exists litigation between the education department(s) and private person(s) who had allegedly encroached upon the property of Schools, as to why the cases are not being expedited by the Courts, particularly, in view of the fact that if there is no stay order, why actions have not been taken and who are responsible for ¬all these illegalities or irregularities.
3. The District and Sessions Judges of all the Provinces including ICT may undertake this task with the assistance of their Additional District and Sessions Judges, keeping in view the workload of each District/Tehsil/Taluka. The President or the Secretary General of the respective District/Tehsil Bar(s) shall also be associated, if need be, in order to carry out physical inspection and submit reports. Copy of this order be sent to the Registrars of all the Provincial High Courts including the Islamabad High Court, for the purpose of submitting report as early as possible within a period of 30-days, after receipt of this order.
4. Mr. Rehmat Ullah Bilal, Coordinator, Sindh Rural, Development Society, may also assist the District and Sessions Judge(s), if need be. The Chief Secretary(s), Secretary Education(s) and all the District Education Officer(s) shall extend, full cooperation to the District and Sessions Judge(s) or the Additional District and Sessions Judge(s) for ensuring accomplishment of the tasks assigned to them.
5. Adjourned to 18-3-2013.
MWA/P-1/SC Order accordingly.

Monday, 29 August 2016

appeal against 7 years conviction lies before Sessions court not High court

appeal against 7 years conviction lies before Sessions court not High court (Mujjan Ali Panhwar)
Ss. 408(b) & 30---Appeal from SENTENCE passed by Judicial MAGISTRATE under S. 30, Cr.P.C.---Forum---Accused persons were convicted by Judicial MAGISTRATE under S. 30, Cr.P.C. and SENTENCE d to seven years imprisonment and FINE ---Accused persons filed appeal against their conviction before the Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed being coram non judice and returned for presenting before the High Court in view of S. 408(b), Cr.P.C.---Legality---Section 408(b), Cr.P.C. stated that a SENTENCE of imprisonment for a term exceeding 4 years, passed by Assistant Sessions Judge, shall be appealable to the High Court---Word "MAGISTRATE /Judicial MAGISTRATE " did not find mention in S. 408(b), Cr.P.C., therefore, said section was not applicable in case of a SENTENCE passed by a MAGISTRATE under S. 30, Cr.P.C.---Impugned order was set aside with the direction that appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge should be considered to be pending---Revision petition was allowed accordingly.
2013 MLD 1054 ISLAMABAD
Side Appellant : JEHANZEB
Side Opponent : State

Sunday, 28 August 2016

legal Notice SSGC










  MUJJAN ALI PANHWAR

ADVOCATE HIGH COURT

 
 

 


ADDRESS:                                           TELEPHONE                                                                                                                        
Opposite FIA Office Mondar               03337068248                                                                                                                                         
Road Dadu.                                                                 

Ref. No. ____________                    Date 26-08-2016

                        __________________________________________

L E G A L  N O T I C E  U/S 80 C.P.C
                      
For  my Client Mohammad Khan s/o Raban  by caste  Panhwar  R/O Village Ismail Achra Near Phulji Station Taluka & District Dadu.

To,

1: Zonal Manager SSGC Dadu Branch
2: Ghulam Sarwar Bhurt(R/O Village Juma Khan Bhurt)
3: Qayoom Bhurt Junior Clerk Mukhtiarkar Office Dadu.


Dear Sir,

                                  Under the instruction of my client Mohammad Khan s/o Raban Khan R/O Village ismail Achra Near Phulji Station, Taluka & District Dadu,  I address you as Under:-


1.                                                       That my above named client is a law abiding and peace loving citizen of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and a well reputed respectable citizen, that he is inhabitant of Village Ismail Achra since ages, The village Ismail Achra is big village and there are about 200 houses of Panhwar community.


2.                                                          That due to struggle of community this village has facility of Gas in whole village Ismail Achra, as there is another village Juman Khan Bhurt which is too away from Village Ismail Achra, and they had evil eye and wanted to


 disconnect the Gas connection of inhabitants of Ismail Achra and they forcibly and illegally got permission to join the connection  of Gas from village Ismail Achra, about 15 years ago.


3.                                                         That after few months, the inhabitants of Ismail Achra felt smell of Gas Leakage and made many complains in office but no vain, at last due to continuous leakage of Gas, all of sudden huge blast occurred in the village, it was day time home of applicant was completely destroyed because line of Gas was under his home, and families received/sustained injuries. Then after the applicant approached to your office and gave application for changing direction or disconnection of Gas Line which was under the homes of applicant, complaint was resolved and the Gas pipe line was disconnected which leads to Village Juma Khan Bhurt and it was decided that until the direction of Gas Pipe Line is changed pipe line will remain disconnect.



4.                                                         That the Village Ismail Achra is now thickly populated and people are living since ages, and this is Revenue Village on map, on Map and Record there is link road which connects the Both Village Ismail Achra and Juma Khan Bhurt, it will be easy reach as well as safety for human being, if the direction of Gas Pipe line may be changed through link Road to Village Juma Khan Bhurt.


5.                                                         That on 25-08-2016 Mukhatiarkar Dadu visited the side and recorded the statement of villagers of Ismail Achra, tapedar of beat showed him record and Map of village and admitted that there is no street and if gas pipe line will be opened there can be again another huge Blast, as previous days the population of Village Ismail Achra was quite small, as now thousands of people are residing.


6.                                                   That it is against the law of land contrary to law, and operate the Gas line which is under the Homes of applicant, and keeping/endangering the lives of human being.
    






                             You are therefore  being advised not to open the Gas Pipe Line of Village Juma Khan Bhurt until direction is changed, if do so, if any losses of lives as buildings occurred to Inhabitants of village Achra, which will purey be at you own risks & costs,  Otherwise there is clear directions from my client to sue against you under civil/ criminal proceedings before the competent courts/forums of law, purely  at your own risk & cost.
                   

   Please note and acknowledge.

                            A copy of this notice is being preserved by us for further legal actions, in case of non compliance, misuse of power and violation of law, by your side.


                         Thanking you.
                                                                                     Yours sincerely
                                                             (MUJJAN ALI PANHWAR)
                                                                      Advocate Dadu
       

legal Notice Mukhtiarkar








  MUJJAN ALI PANHWAR

ADVOCATE HIGH COURT

 
 
ADDRESS:                                           TELEPHONE                                                                                                                
Opposite FIA Office Mondar               03337068248                                                                                                                         
Road Dadu.                                                                 

Ref. No. ____________                    Date 26-08-2016

                __________________________________________

L E G A L  N O T I C E  U/S 80 C.P.C
                      
For  my Client Mohammad Khan s/o Raban  by caste  Panhwar  R/O Village Ismail Achra Near Phulji Station Taluka & District Dadu.
To,

1: Mukhtiarkar (Rev) Dadu.
2: Qayoom Bhurt Junior Clerk Mukhtiarkar Office Dadu.

Dear Sir,

                                  Under the instruction of my client Mohammad Khan s/o Raban Khan R/O Village ismail Achra Near Phulji Station, Taluka & District Dadu,  I address you as Under:-

1.                                                       That my above named client is a law abiding and peace loving citizen of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and a well reputed respectable citizen, that he is inhabitant of Village Ismail Achra since ages, The village Ismail Achra is big village and there are about 200 houses of Panhwar community.

2.                                                          That due to struggle of community this village has facility of Gas in whole village Ismail Achra, as there is another village Juman Khan Bhurt which is too away from Village Ismail Achra, and they had evil eye and wanted to


 disconnect the Gas connection of inhabitants of Ismail Achra and they forcibly and illegally got permission to join the connection  of Gas from village Ismail Achra, about 15 years ago.

3.                                                         That after few months, the inhabitants of Ismail Achra felt smell of Gas Leakage and made many complains in office but no vain, at last due to continuous leakage of Gas, all of sudden huge blast occurred in the village, it was day time home of applicant was completely destroyed because line of Gas was under his home, and families received/sustained injuries. Then after the applicant approached to SSGC dadu office and gave application for changing direction or disconnection of Gas Line which was under the homes of applicant, complaint was resolved and the Gas pipe line was disconnected which leads to Village Juma Khan Bhurt and it was decided that until the direction of Gas Pipe Line is changed pipe line will remain disconnect.

4.                                                         That the Village Ismail Achra is now thickly populated and people are living since ages, and this is Revenue Village on map, on Map and Record there is link road which connects the Both Villages Ismail Achra and Juma Khan Bhurt, it will be easy reach as well as safety for human being, if the direction of Gas Pipe line may be changed through link Road to Village Juma Khan Bhurt.

5.                                                         That on 20-08-2016 my client received notice from your good office through Qayoom Bhurt Junior clerk, the notice was without any office stamp, neither any outward no, But my client voluntarily came to your office, where he was humiliated by Qayoom Bhurt, and he said police constable to keep him under custody and the constable handcuffed him upto 4 hours, which is contrary to law.


6.                                                         That on 25-08-2016 you have visited the side and recorded the statement of villagers of Ismail


Achra, the Tapedar of beat showed you record and Map of village and admitted that there is no street and if gas pipe line will be opened there can be again another huge Blast, as previous days the population of Village Ismail Achra was quite small, as now thousands of people are residing.

7.                                                   That it is against the law of land contrary to law, and operate the Gas line which is under the Homes of applicant, and keeping/endangering the lives of human being.
    
                             You are therefore  being advised to take stern action against (Qayoom Bhurt Junior Clerk in your office) and inquire the matter that who is sending the false notice without any stamp and signature are being issued from your good office, and Qayoom is violating the powers and making the harassment to the villagers of Ismail Achra on the basis of your good office,  which will purey be at your own risks & costs,  Otherwise there is clear directions from my client to sue against him under civil/ criminal proceedings before the competent courts/forums of law, purely  at risk & cost.              

   Please note and acknowledge.

                            A copy of this notice is being preserved by us for further legal actions, in case of non compliance, misuse of power and violation of law, by your Junior Clerk.

                         Thanking you.
                                                                                 Yours sincerely
                                                         (MUJJAN ALI PANHWAR)
                                                                   Advocate Dadu